Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1954No. 367PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The defendant filed a motion in arrest of judgment in this Court. The motion is based upon the fact that the reference to the statute in the warrant upon which the defendant was tried is incorrect. The warrant charges that “on or about the 26th day of Sept., 1953, Howard S. Smith violated the following law, of wit: General Statutes of North Carolina, 1943, Section 20-189 as amended, in that he did unlawfully and willfully operate a motor vehicle on the public roads while under the influence of intoxicating liquors, opiates or narcotic drugs, . . .” (Italics ours.)

A warrant will not be quashed…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Withers v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. State v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. State v. CamelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API