State v. Furley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
The defendant was convicted of the sordid crime of using instruments to produce an abortion on the person of one Maline Brew-ington. The evidence offered by the State was sufficient to sustaimthe charge set out in the bill of indictment and to support the verdict and judgment, but the defendant assigns errors in the trial which she contends were sufficiently prejudicial to entitle her to another hearing.
As the basis of her appeal, in her brief, she presents two questions for review:
1. The State’s witness Maline Brewington testified as to the manner and means and to the fact of the abortion…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Summerlin v. Carolina & North-Western RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Summerlin v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Patrick v. . TreadwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966