Legal Opinion
Riccomini v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 20, 1934No. 7252PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order’of the District Court sustaining defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint, upon the solo ground that the causes of action therein stated were not within the jurisdiction of that court.
The complaint in the first cause of action sets forth that the United States is indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $2,167.50, alleged to have beeii illegally exacted on the 7th day of August, 1926, as customs duties, for the importation of merchandise some six years pri- or to filing the complaint. The exactions were pursuant to paragraph 802 of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- De Lima v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Fisk v. HenarieSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Eastern States Petroleum Corporation v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Cottman Co. v. DaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Commodities Export Co., a Michigan Corporation v. U.S. Customs Service, an Agency of the U.S. GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Patchogue-Plymouth Mills Corporation v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Horton v. HumphreyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1956
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.