Legal Opinion
Horton v. Humphrey
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 20, 1956No. Civ. A. 1038-56PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs are importers of cast iron soil pipe from the United Kingdom. They are threatened with application of a “special dumping duty” under the Antidumping Act of 1921, as amended, 19 U.S.C.A. § 160 et seq. They ask a declaratory judgment that the Act is in violation of the United States Constitution, that certain procedures under the Act or under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq., have not been complied with, and that certain findings of the Secretary of the Treasury and the United States Tariff Commission, defendants here, are invalid.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hill v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Kleberg & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- Cottman Co. v. DaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Riccomini v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Eastern States Petroleum Corporation v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Commodities Export Co., a Michigan Corporation v. U.S. Customs Service, an Agency of the U.S. GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Bob Jones University v. John B. Connally, Secretary of the Treasury of the United States and Johnnie M. Walters, Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- The Timken Company v. William E. Simon, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- J. C. Penney Co. v. United States Treasury DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.