Legal Opinion

Cottman Co. v. Dailey

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 4, 1938No. 4236PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction a suit instituted to enjoin the defendant Collector of Customs from liquidating an entry at the port of Baltimore of certain phosphate rock, and assessing thereon a special dumping duty under the Antidumping Act of 1921, 19 U.S.C.A. §§ 160-173, based upon an appraisal which had already been the subject of extended litigation in the United States Customs Court and the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. The opinion of the lower court is reported in D.C., 20 F.Supp. 142.

The phosphate rock…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Dodge v. OsbornSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Waite v. MacYSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. United States v. Sherman & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Argosy Limited v. Franklin Hennigan, Individually and as Acting District Director of CustomsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Eastern States Petroleum Corporation v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  3. Patchogue-Plymouth Mills Corporation v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  4. The Timken Company v. William E. Simon, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  5. Horton v. HumphreyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1956

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API