Legal Opinion
Williams v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 29, 1933No. 728PublishedCited by 168 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutheeland
Plaintiff is, and since November 11, 1929, has been, a judge of the Court of Claims of the United States. Since his entry upon the duties of his office, and until June 30, 1932, he received a salary at the rate of $12,500 per annum, as fixed by the Act of .December 13,1926, c. 6, § 1, 44 Stab 919. Since that date he has been paid at the rate of $10,000 per annum under a ruling of the Comptroller General of the United, States. Compare O’Donoghue v. United States, decided this day, ante, p. 516.
The Legislative Appropriation Act of June 30, 1932 (c. 314, 47 Stat. 382, 402) in part provides:
“…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
- Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by168 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.