Legal Opinion
B. & R. Excess Corp. v. Thacher
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1962PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Tilzer, J.
Petitioners in this article 78 proceeding seek a determination vacating and annulling regulation No. 41 promulgated by respondent on August 23,1962, effective October 1, 1962. Petitioners are “ excess line ” brokers, which may be defined as a person, firm or association authorized within certain restrictions to procure specified types of insurance policies from insurance companies which are not authorized to do business in this State.
Provisions for the licensing and control of such brokers are incorporated in section 122 of the Insurance Law. Pursuant to that section, a licensee is 16…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hoopeston Canning Co. v. CullenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Matter of Marburg v. ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Aloe v. DasslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Mendola v. DineenNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. BevevinoNew York Magistrate Court · 1952
3Cited by10 opinions
- Breen v. Cunard Lines Steamship Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. Condor of the Americas, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1964
- Polly Esther's South, Inc. v. Setnor Byer Bogdanoff, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2005
- National Superlease, Inc. v. Reliance InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Government Employees Insurance v. SilberNew York Supreme Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.