Legal Opinion
Matter of Marburg v. Cole
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 29, 1941PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.
The petitioner in this proceeding, a licensed Austrian physician, has submitted to the appellants, the Commissioner of Education and the Board of Regents, an application for the indorsement of his Austrian license to practice medicine, without examination, pursuant to the power granted to them by the provisions of section 1259 of the. Education Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 16). The question presented for decision is whether the refusal by the appellants to indorse petitioner’s license is arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable so as to constitute an abuse of the discretion conferred upon appellants by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. BrownellSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- New York Ex Rel. Lieberman v. Van De CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- New York State Ass'n of Counties v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Bernstein v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Matter of Park East Land Corp. v. FinkelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Frishman v. SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re the Arbitration between Shand & Aetna InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.