Legal Opinion
People v. Condor of the Americas, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.
Plaintiff, the People of the State of New York, move for summary judgment against defendant, Continental Casualty Company, in this action to recover on a bond issued by Continental. Continental’s codefendant, Condor of the Americas, Inc., procured a license from the Insurance Department of the State of New York, to act as an excess line insurance broker, and in its application named its president, Robert A. Gormley, as its only sublicensee, to be authorized to act under the license. Pursuant to subdivision 8 of section 122 of the Insurance Law, Condor was required to and did file a bond in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. MaloneySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Post v. . DoremusNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- B. & R. Excess Corp. v. ThacherNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Winkelman v. WinkelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,164 Index Fund, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Polly Esther's South, Inc. v. Setnor Byer Bogdanoff, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2005
- City of New York v. Britestarr Homes, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1991
- Greenville Fire Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Supreme Court · 1977
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,164 Index Fund, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.