Legal Opinion
National Superlease, Inc. v. Reliance Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Alfred D. Lerner, J.
This is a motion by defendants for summary judgment on the grounds that there are no triable issues of fact and that the insurance policy on which plaintiff’s claims are based is void and unenforceable as a matter of law.
On appeal from various orders of Special Term and Trial Term, the Appellate Division directed the parties to complete all discovery within a specified time and placed the action on the Trial Calendar for a date certain, subject to the direction of the Justice then presiding. (National Superlease v Reliance Ins. Co., 103 AD2d 737.)
As a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Newman v. DoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Teeter v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Teeter v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Millington v. RapoportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. v. RossalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Superlease, Inc. v. Reliance InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- 81 Franklin Co. v. GinacciniCivil Court of the City of New York · 1990
- Aetna Casualty. v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996