Legal Opinion
Mendola v. Dineen
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 18, 1945PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHecht, J.
Plaintiff moves for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Defendant cross-moves for judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits.
Plaintiff sues for a judgment declaring sections 40, 42 and all of article VI of the Insurance Law of the State of New York unconstitutional as in contravention of the commerce clause of the Constitution of the United States (U. S. Const., art. I, § 8). He asks that defendant, as Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, be restrained from enforcing the provisions of the Insurance Law above referred to.
In…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hoopeston Canning Co. v. CullenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- B. & R. Excess Corp. v. ThacherNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Cirlin v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1958
- State v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. BarnettMississippi Supreme Court · 1946
- Prudential Ins. Co. v. BarnettMississippi Supreme Court · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.