Legal Opinion

Leisnoi, Inc. v. Stratman

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1998No. S-8005PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case concerns another dispute between Omar Stratman and Leisnoi, Inc., an Alaska Native Village Corporation, over rights to land near Kalsin Bay. Stratman and Leisnoi negotiated and agreed to the entry of a permanent injunction limiting Stratman’s right to come onto Leisnoi’s land. Shortly after the trial court entered the permanent injunction, Stratman began to extract gravel from Leisnoi’s land pursuant to a quitclaim deed. Based on this conduct, Leisnoi moved for an order to show cause why Stratman was not in contempt for violating the injunction. Stratman…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Davis v. DykmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Little Susitna Construction Co. v. Soil Processing, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Singh v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sowinski v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Beal v. McGuireAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Anchorage Chrysler Center, Inc. v. DaimlerChrysler Motors Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Rockstad v. Global Finance & Investment Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Exxon Corp. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API