Legal Opinion
Little Susitna Construction Co. v. Soil Processing, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1997No. S-7451PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
This appeal arises from a dispute centering on a “turn-key” provision in an equipment lease.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
In September of 1992, Little Susitna Construction Company, Inc. (LSC) negotiated ■with the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Small Business Administration (SBA) for the award of a contract to remediate fuel-contaminated soil at Fort Richardson. On September 4,1992, in contemplation of being awarded the contract, LSC entered into a “turn-key” lease agreement with Soil Processing, Inc. (SPI).
The agreement called for SPI to provide LSC with…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. O'KELLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Graham v. RockmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Alaska Northern Development, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Alaska Diversified Contractors, Inc. v. Lower Kuskokwim School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Norville v. Carr-Gottstein Foods Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Cook v. CookAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Zito v. ZitoAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Estate of Polushkin Ex Rel. Polushkin v. MawAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Krossa v. All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.