Legal Opinion
Davis v. Dykman
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 1997No. S-7523, S-7563PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Appellants Stewart Davis, Jr. and Allstate Insurance Company argue that there was an enforceable settlement agreement that resolved personal injury tort claims asserted by Mark Dykman against Davis, and that the superior court erred in holding otherwise. We affirm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
In April 1993 Stewart Davis, Jr. lost control of the ear he was driving. It left the road and overturned. Mark Dykman, a passenger in the car, suffered head injuries and a spinal cord injury that rendered him a quadriplegic.
Allstate Insurance Company had issued a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- French v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Bohna v. HUGHES, THORSNESS, GANTZAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Rego v. DeckerAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Nielson v. BentonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Martech Construction Co. v. Ogden Environmental Services, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Brady v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Valdez Fisheries Development Ass'n v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Liimatta v. VestAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Crane v. CraneAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.