Legal Opinion

Schatzel v. Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 22, 2013No. Case No. 12 C 5243PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge:

Frederick Schatzel has sued the Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund (Central States) and the Western Pennsylvania Teamsters and Employers Pension Fund (Western Pennsylvania) for pension benefits that he contends the defendants owe him. Schatzel alleges that defendants violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., by wrongfully denying him benefits and by violating their fiduciary duties in their dealings with him. Schatzel has also asserted a state law claim…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Arnett v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BLACKLEDGE v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2024
  2. Smith v. Lutheran Life MinistriesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  3. Smith v. Lutheran Life MinistriesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API