Ayotte v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
JOAN B. GOTTSCHALL, District Judge.
Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”) moves to dismiss Plaintiff James Ayotte’s Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 12(b)(6). Ayotte sued Prudential pursuant to §§ 502(a)(1)(B) and (g) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132(a)(1)(B) and (g). He seeks benefits allegedly due to him under a long-term disability policy (“the Plan”), provided to employees of ISI Telemanagement Solutions, Inc. (“ISI”), which was issued, underwritten, funded, and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swanson v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Salomon Smith Barney Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Daniel Virnich v. Jeffrey VorwaldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kenneth Whitten v. Midwest Refrigeration Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025