Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Aviall, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 2, 2011No. 09 C 2387PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge.
Kathleen G. Schultz (“Schultz”) and Mary Kelly (“Kelly”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., against the Aviall, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan (“Aviall Plan”) and the Perkins Coie Long Term Disability Plan (“Perkins Coie Plan”) (collectively, “Defendants”) to recover long-term disability payments that were allegedly wrongfully withheld. (R. 49-2, Third Am. Compl.) Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Swanson v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Tamayo v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hallinan v. Fraternal Order of Police of Chicago Lodge No. 7Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Yoshio Oto, of the Estate of Noboru Oto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Ashby Beverley, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schultz v. Aviall, Inc. Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Mayhew v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Smith v. Lutheran Life MinistriesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023