Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 14, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2005-1276PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
In the early 2000s, the United States engaged in a war in Iraq, which persisted for several years. To support the military on the ground, the United States government contracted with civilian companies to provide a wide variety of services. Defendant Kellogg, Brown & Root (“KBR”) received one of these contracts. This dispute revolves around KBR’s contracting practices while in Iraq, specifically, KBR’s subcontracts with defendant Daoud & Partners (“D&P”). 1 Relator Harry Barko filed an amended complaint in 2007…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Westrick v. Second Chance Body Armor, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States ex rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- United States ex rel. Hutchins v. Dyncorp Int'l, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Agdipa v. ErtayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Bush v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.