Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 27, 2017No. 17-7057PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and on the briefs and oral arguments of the parties. The Court has afforded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See Fed. R. App. P. 36; D.C. Cir. R. 36(d). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s judgment is affirmed.
Harry Barko’s appeal is from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Barko brought his qni tarn action alleging that Kellogg Brown & Root and its affiliates…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. EscobarSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Haynes, Charles v. Williams, AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Independent Petroleum Ass'n of America v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- In Re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bush v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Hunt v. Cochise Consultancy, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2025
- Klotzbach-Piper v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Marsteller v. TiltonDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021