Legal Opinion
Agdipa v. Ertay
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 18, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2024-1491Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHARON THOMAS AGDIPA, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24-1491 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell ANIL OZGE ERTAY, HUSNU SINAN ERTAY, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Sharon Agdipa brings this action against her former employers, Hüsnü Sinan Ertay and Anil Özge Ertay (the “Ertays”), for violating the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Reauthorization Act,
18 U.S.C. §§ 1589
& 1590 (Count I), the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(f) (Count II), the D.C. Minimum Wage Revision Act,
D.C. Code §§ 32-1001, et. seq. (Count…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.