Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Hutchins v. Dyncorp Int'l, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 28, 2018No. Civil Action No. 15-355 (RMC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
B. Alleging Fraud
Complaints brought under the False Claims Act must comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b). United States ex rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp. , 286 F.3d 542, 551-52 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Rule 9(b) requires that a "party state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake. Malice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind may be alleged generally." Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b). However, " Rule 9(b) is still subject to the general short and plain statement command set out in Rule 8." United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. EscobarSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Richard Williams v. Martin-Baker Aircraft Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- United States Ex Rel. Yesudian v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- United States of America, Exrel., Insoon Lee v. Smithkline Beecham, Inc. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories Does 1-100Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Science Applications International Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hawkins v. Man Tech International CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Hutchins v. Dyncorp International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Pca Integrity Associates, LLP v. Nco Financial Systems IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Scollick v. NarulaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021