Legal Opinion

Dawn Investment Co. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1982No. L.A. 31413PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROUSSARD, J.

Wellenkamp v. Bank of America (1978) 21 Cal.3d 943 [148 Cal.Rptr. 379, 582 P.2d 970], held that lender enforcement of a due-on-sale clause, contained in a deed of trust or promissory note secured by real property, constitutes an unreasonable restraint on alienation unless the lender can demonstrate that enforcement is reasonably necessary to protect against the impairment of security or risk of default. In the instant case we conclude that the Wellenkamp rule applies to noninstitutional lenders and to commercial property.

In March 1977, petitioners 1 sold a 16-unit…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. De La Cuesta v. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Snow v. Western Savings & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Barry M. Dechtman, Inc. v. Sidpaul Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Smith v. KruegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Martin v. Peoples Mutual Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  5. First Investment Co. v. Custer (In Re Custer)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API