De La Cuesta v. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, Acting P. J.—
Introduction
This is an appeal from summary judgment in favor of defendants in three cases consolidated in the trial court. Where appropriate, the cases will be referred to as the de la Cuesta case, the Moore case, and the Whitcombe case. Each action was commenced by the purchaser of property encumbered by a deed of trust seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against threatened foreclosure of the deed of trust by trustee’s sale following the purported exercise of the trust deed’s due-on-sale clause. The principal defendant in each action is the beneficiary…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- New York State Department of Social Services v. DublinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- City of Milwaukee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rubin v. Los Angeles Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Conference of State Bank Supervisors v. C. Todd Conover, Comptroller of the Currency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Dawn Investment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Northwestern Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Fargo v. TernesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.