Legal Opinion

Howell v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 17, 2002No. 97-849 CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

TURNER, Judge.

This case involves contract claims against the United States. In 1990, the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) awarded to plaintiff a series of ten indefinite-quantity services contracts for the mowing and maintenance of properties owned by the FmHA in various counties throughout Florida. Plaintiff contends that the contracts had “guaranteed minimum” clauses which required payments to him when no services were ordered. Defendant contends that the contracts contained no obligation for payment when services were not performed; defendant also asserts the affirmative…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  2. Willard, Sutherland & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Mason v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. Crown Laundry & Dry Cleaners, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  5. Coyle's Pest Control, Inc. v. Andrew Cuomo, Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Unfoldment, Inc. v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Schortmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Vane Minerals (Us), LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Boydstun Metal Works, Inc. v. Cottrell, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2007
  5. Seh Ahn Lee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API