Legal Opinion

Vane Minerals (Us), LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 29, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00413PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq.; Arizona Wilderness Act of 1984, Pub. L. 98-406, 98 Stat. 1485 (as amended); Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq.; Mining Law of 1872, 30 U.S.C. §§ 22-47; National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq.; Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. §§ 1201-1328 (governing surface coal mining operations); Ripeness; 36 C.F.R. § 228.4(e) (plan of…

Read the full summary

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq.; Arizona Wilderness Act of 1984, Pub. L. 98-406, 98 Stat. 1485 (as amended); Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq.; Mining Law of 1872, 30 U.S.C. §§ 22-47; National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq.; Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. §§ 1201-1328 (governing surface coal mining operations); Ripeness; 36 C.F.R. § 228.4(e) (plan of operations for mining on Forest Service lands); 36 C.F.R. § 228.5(a)(l)-(5) (approving a plan of operations for mining on…

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER

BRADEN, Judge.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND. 1

VANE Minerals (US), LLC (“Plaintiff’), a Delaware limited liability company, has been in the business of locating and exploring mineral properties in Northern Arizona since 1979. Compl. ¶¶ 5, 10; 1/2/13 Hefton Decl. ¶ 2. Since October 2004, Plaintiff primarily has focused on uranium exploration and mining, and has invested more than $8.5 million in uranium mining exploration. Compl. ¶¶ 5, 8,11; 1/2/13 Hefton Decl. ¶ 1.

As of June 21, 2013, Plaintiff held 678 unpatented lode mining claims on two areas of federal land in…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Complaint of Ingram Barge Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Chittenden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Kingman Reef Atoll Investments, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Reoforce, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  5. Grand Canyon Trust v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API