Legal Opinion

Torncello v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 16, 1982No. 486-80CPublishedCited by 238 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBennett, Judge

This is a government contract case, before us on motions for summary judgment. At issue is the government’s diversion of business away from a party, with whom it had executed a requirements contract, to a competing bidder on the original solicitation. The government defends that this diversion was justified by the constructive application to its actions of the standard "termination for the convenience of the government” clause in federal procurement. For several simple and compelling reasons, involving basic tenets of contract law, we hold that the termination for convenience clause does not…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. Perry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by238 opinions

  1. Galen Medical Associates, Inc. v. United States, and Deborah Downing Md, PllcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  2. Am-Pro Protective Agency, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  3. Ingersoll-Rand Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  4. Flores v. Municipio de CaguasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1983
  5. Do-Well MacHine Shop, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989

233 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API