Legal Opinion

Ron Greenspan Volkswagen, Inc. v. Ford Motor Land Development Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1995No. A065041PublishedCited by 18 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAERLE, J.

I. Introduction

This is an appeal from a summary judgment for defendants in a fraud action involving a failed commercial transaction. The primary issue is whether a contract clause which states that the parties relied only on representations contained in the contract establishes, as a matter of law, that a party claiming fraud did not reasonably rely on representations not contained in the contract. We hold that such a per se rule is inconsistent with California law and reverse the summary judgment.

II. Statement of Facts

A. The Parties

Appellant, Ronald A. Greenspan (Greenspan)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Continental Airlines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Ferguson v. KochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Hinesley v. Oakshade Town CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. United Guaranty Mortgage Indemnity Co. v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
  4. Wang v. Massey ChevroletCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Brakke v. Economic Concepts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API