Ron Greenspan Volkswagen, Inc. v. Ford Motor Land Development Corp.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAERLE, J.
I. Introduction
This is an appeal from a summary judgment for defendants in a fraud action involving a failed commercial transaction. The primary issue is whether a contract clause which states that the parties relied only on representations contained in the contract establishes, as a matter of law, that a party claiming fraud did not reasonably rely on representations not contained in the contract. We hold that such a per se rule is inconsistent with California law and reverse the summary judgment.
II. Statement of Facts
A. The Parties
Appellant, Ronald A. Greenspan (Greenspan)…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Ferguson v. KochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Hinesley v. Oakshade Town CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- United Guaranty Mortgage Indemnity Co. v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Wang v. Massey ChevroletCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Brakke v. Economic Concepts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.