Legal Opinion
Hinesley v. Oakshade Town Center
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 29, 2005No. C045865PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, J.
Plaintiff Barry Hinesley (Hinesley) challenges on appeal the summary judgment granted defendant Oakshade Town Center (Oakshade) on Hinesley’s first amended complaint for fraud and rescission of his commercial lease with Oakshade. Hinesley contends Oakshade did not conclusively negate or show Hinesley could not prove an essential element of his case. We disagree and shall affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
In July 1998 Hinesley signed a five-year commercial lease with Oakshade for 1,200 square feet of retail space in a shopping center located in the south part of the city…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- McClain v. Octagon Plaza, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Rockridge Trust v. Wells Fargo, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- DeJung v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Hoffman v. 162 North Wolfe CA6California Court of Appeal · 2014
- United Guaranty Mortgage Indemnity Co. v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.