Perkins Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Owen
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES, District Judge.
Defendant has presented exceptions to interrogatories propounded by the plaintiff. The suit is for infringement of patent, and claim is made for recovery of treble damages under the statutory provision. The defendant insists -that to compel him to make answer to the interrogatories may result in admissions *760being extracted from him which will aid in making out a case justifying treble damages, and that hence he is privileged not to answer. Counsel for the plaintiff was disposed at the argument to admit that the defendant might not be compelled to answer interrogatories…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Bronk v. Charles H. Scott Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
- Levy v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Quirk v. QuirkDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1919
- Cobb Temperature Regulator Co. v. BairdDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Allred v. GravesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Graham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Beacon Folding MacH. Co. v. Rotary MacH. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927
- Standard Oil Co. v. Roxana Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1925
- Armstrong v. Allen B. Du Mont Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.