Ex Parte Boyd
Supreme Court of the United States
’ Petition, fora writ of habeas corpus. The facts and the statutes', bearing. upon the question Involved aré set out in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews
¡delivered the opinion of the court.
It is made to appear, by this application, that a judgment was recovered in the Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York, in favor of the United States against Robert Boyd, the petitioner* and Francis O’Rourke, on which execution was issued and: returned unsatisfied, except in the sum of $200* leaving due thereon $8*128.92. It was- thereupon ordered by the court, on motion of the plaintiff’s attorney, that the matter, be’ referred' to Joseph M. Deuel, Esq., a commissioner of the court,’ “ to examine the said Robert Boyd and Francis O’Rourke, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Boyle v. Zacharie & TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Duncan v. DarstSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- Palmer v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
3Cited by47 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Ex Parte FISKSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Fox v. Capital Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Mutual Reserve Fund Life Assn. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.