Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Allen B. Du Mont Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 16, 1955No. Civ. A. 1580PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
This action was instituted by Edwin H. Armstrong on December 13, 1953. Jurisdiction is alleged under the Patent Laws of the United States. The complaint was for injunctive process and for damages for past infringement and alleged that Armstrong was the patentee and sole owner of six patents as follows: No. 1,941,066 issued Dec. 26, 1933 (expired Dec. 26, 1950); No. 1,941,068 issued Dec. 26, 1933 (expired Dec. 26, 1950); No. 1,941,069 issued Dee. 26, 1933 (expired Dec. 26, 1950); No. 2,-098,698 issued Nov. 9, 1937 (expired Nov. 9, 1954); No. 2,215,284 issued Sept. 17,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re EichnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Puma v. MarriottDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1969
- Helen Russell Pierce, of the Last Will and Testament of George Washington Pierce, Deceased v. Allen B. Du Mont Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Derdiarian v. Futterman CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Armstrong v. Motorola, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.