Legal Opinion

Levy v. Superior Court of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1895No. 15577PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Hearing in the Supreme Court upon writ of prohibition to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, Department 9, Hon. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.

Morris Hoeflich died at the city and county of San Francisco in May, 1891, and Solomon Hoeflich was, by the superior court of said city and county, appointed administrator of his estate.

Thereafter, on the day of June, 1893, the administrator filed in said superior court a petition in the matter of said estate, averring, in substance, that it had come to his knowledge that said deceased was, at and prior to his death, a partner with one H. M. Levy, or engaged with said Levy jointly in a large number of transactions in stocks and mines in California and Nevada, and in other property, “ the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Lees v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Ex parte CaseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Mesmer v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rescue Army v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Harden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Allred v. GravesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Bell v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Estate of SchechtmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API