Legal Opinion
People of the State of California v. United States of America, Santa Margarita Mutual Water Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 30, 1956No. 19-56393PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.
The United States brought an action against some three thousand (3,000) defendants to quiet title to water rights claimed to be appurtenant to lands acquired in 1941-1943 and used for various purposes of the army and navy and which, collectively, with additions from the public domain, will be referred to as “Pendleton.”
The history of this litigation appears in United States v. Fallbrook Public Utility Dist., D. C., 101 F.Supp. 298, 108 F.Supp. 72, 109 F.Supp. 28 and 110 F. Supp. 767.
The State of California was served as a defendant and appeared as intervenor.
On…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Litchfield v. Goodnow's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff v. Linda Ann DigregorioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Elizabeth Taylor v. Portland Paramount CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Orange County Water District v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- State of California, United States of America v. Everett G. RankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.