Legal Opinion
Elizabeth Taylor v. Portland Paramount Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 19, 1967No. 21334_1PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
Taylor appeals under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b) from an order denying her motion to quash service of summons upon her. We reverse. The opinion of the District Court is reported in Portland Paramount Corp. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., D.Or., 1966, 258 F.Supp. 962, and this opinion assumes that the reader is familiar with it.
Two questions are presented, both involving the Oregon “long arm” statute, ORS § 14.035, enacted in 1963. These are, whether Taylor’s activities bring her within the terms of the statute, and whether, if they do, she is thereby deprived of due…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Dever v. Hentzen CoatingsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Amba Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Jobar International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Wilshire Oil Company of Texas v. L. E. Riffe, O. Homer Riffe and Thomas J. MastersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.