Legal Opinion

McConaghy v. McConaghy

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 1966No. Civ. No 7631PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINLEY, J. pro tem. *

This is an appeal from an order directing the sale of property.

The parties were formerly husband and wife but since divorced. In an interlocutory judgment directing sale of the subject property, a trailer park, they were found to be tenants in common, each owning an undivided one-half interest. As a part of its decree the court appointed a receiver to take charge of and to manage and operate the trailer park, to improve it to the point where it would comply with the Municipal Code of the City of San Diego and as referee to sell the same at private sale for the best price…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lacey v. BertoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Schubert v. ReichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. County of San Bernardino v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Estate of PailheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Swallers v. SwallersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tate v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Farrar v. McCormickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Alliance Bank v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Arambula v. Union Carbide Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Alliance Bank v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API