Legal Opinion
Alliance Bank v. Murray
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 22, 1984No. B003692PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
—Defendant Steven Murray (appellant) appeals from the default judgment entered subsequent to the court’s order striking defendant’s answer to the complaint and entering his default as sanctions for his wilful failure to attend two properly noticed depositions. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2034, subd. (d).) For reasons to follow, we affirm.
Factual Background
On March 15, 1982, appellant executed and delivered to respondent Alliance Bank (respondent) a promissory note for $92,000 due in full on June 15, 1982. Respondent unsuccessfully demanded payment on the note on June 15, 1982, and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- In re GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Gagnon Co., Inc. v. Nevada Desert InnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alliance Bank v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984