Legal Opinion
Tate v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 12, 1975No. Civ. 35894PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOLINARI, P. J.
Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate directing respondent court to set aside its dismissal of an action for damages for personal injuries. An alternative writ was issued by this court.
The complaint was filed on August 9, 1972. Real party in interest answered the complaint on August 24, 1972. Petitioner filed a memorandum on August 31, 1972, that the case was at issue, pursuant to rule 206 of the California Rules of Court. Although a notice of eligibility to file a certificate of readiness was served on petitioner in December 1973, none was filed. On September 4, 1974, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Minsky v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Reynolds v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Bohn v. BohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Lacey v. BertoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Overton v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Wilson v. Sunshine Meat & Liquor Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. Arthur Theodore Towne Dane Joseph TreiberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Carlton v. QuintCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.