Legal Opinion
City of Wagoner v. Black
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 12, 1939No. 28976PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
The defendant in error, as plaintiff, commenced this action to recover $10,000 in damages from the plaintiff in error, as defendant, for personal injuries from a fall he received upon one of the defendant’s streets. The fall occurred when the plaintiff stumbled over a wire extending across Ninth street immediately after Walking into said street from Smith avenue at approximately 7:30 p. m. on April 19, 1937. Both streets are unpaved.
The plaintiff’s fall was caused by a piece of telephone wiring, one end of which was fastened to a stake on one side, of Ninth street while the other end lay in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- City of Tulsa v. FryeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Armstrong v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- City of Hugo v. NanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- City of Ada v. BurrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lane v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Terry v. EdginSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Bannister v. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Butler v. Civic Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Swart Ex Rel. Swart v. City of VinitaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.