Legal Opinion
Lane v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 1, 1965No. 40718PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
George W. Lane (plaintiff below) appeals from the order of the lower court dismissing his action for personal injuries against City of Tulsa (defendant below). The order of dismissal was made as a consequence of the court sustaining defendant’s motion to abate the plaintiff’s action.
The pertinent allegations of plaintiff’s amended petition are, that on August 3, 1961, there was a ditch approximately 15 inches wide and 17 inches deep extending completely across the sidewalk near the intersection of Fifth Street and Houston Avenue in the city of Tulsa; that the employees of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Austin v. DanielsTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Oklahoma City v. TyteniczSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Spaur v. City of PawhuskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Williams v. City of BristowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- White v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Haas v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Oklahoma City v. PrietoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Terry v. EdginSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Shockey v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Ochoa Ex Rel. Hughes v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.