City of Hugo v. Nance
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court„ Choctaw County; James R. Armstrong, Judge. Action by Mrs. M. L. Nance against the City of Hugo. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBERTSON, C.
This is an action by Mrs. M. L. Nance against the city of Hugo- to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been received on account of a defective sidewalk. She alleges in her petition substantially that on or about the 15th day of December, 1909, a deep and dangerous excavation was made in the sidewalk in said city under the direction of said city; that the said city negligently suffered the said excavation to remain open, without proper lights or other signals to apprise passers-by of its existence; that at or about 6 o’clock in the evening of said day, as she…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Storrs v. . the City of UticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Conrad v. . the Trustees of the Village of IthacaNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- City of Detroit v. CoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
- Wilson v. City of WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
- Village of Jefferson v. ChapmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Colonial Refining Co. v. LathropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Bouziden v. Alfalfa Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- City of Chickasha v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- City of Woodward v. BowderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.