Legal Opinion
Rosera v. International Harvester Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided January 3, 1986No. 81-C-1463PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WARREN, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
This civil action was tried to an eight-member jury, including alternate, over a two-week period beginning on March 4, 1985. On March 19, 1985, following one day of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict of $2,398,150.32 in favor of the plaintiffs, Alfred C. and Shirley Rosera, and against the defendants, International Harvester Company and Dart Transit Company. Among other things, the jury found International Harvester Company 75% at fault for the plaintiffs’ damages and assigned the remaining 25% liability to Dart Transit Company.
Signif…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Robert G. TICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAMPERT YARDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Evans, Inc. v. Tiffany & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
- Laron McKinley v. Lt. Gary TrattlesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fort Howard Paper Company, Cross-Appellant v. Standard Havens, Inc. And Continental Casualty Company, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Land v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Hutchison v. Amateur Electronics Supply, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
- Geshwind v. GarrickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- NHC LLC v. Centaur Construction Company Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.