Legal Opinion

Allen v. Blaisdell

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 23, 1952No. Patent Appeal 5838PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Chief Judge.. This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding priority to the party Blaisdell in an interference proceeding involving a single count which reads: “A bearing shim adapted to be placed under a shaft bearing and formed of shim stock, said shim being tapered from the center to both edges thereof.”

Cocklin filed November 9, 1945, which was prior to the filing dates of both Allen and Blaisdell, and it is said in the decision of the board that “all of the parties filed preliminary statements and briefs.”…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ritter v. Rohm & Haas CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  2. Davis v. ReddyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
  3. Robert C. Woofter v. Vernon E. CarlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. In re BlaisdellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  5. Morway v. BondiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API