Legal Opinion
Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided January 5, 1983No. C.A. 74-H-790PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER
On October 27, 1982, this Court entered its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in the above-captioned cause. It has come to the attention of the Court that the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law entered on October 27,1982, contained several typographical and non-substantive errors. Hence, to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of October 27, 1982, the Court hereby directs that the attached corrected version of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law be entered. This Order shall relate back to the time of entry of…
2Cases cited378 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
373 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
- Rohm and Haas Company v. Crystal Chemical Company and Joe C. EllerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Mendenhall v. Barber-Greene Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Bert G. Gianelli Distributing Co. v. Beck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Korody-Colyer Corporation v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.