Legal Opinion
United States v. Kirksey
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 14, 1986No. M-18-304 (RWS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Respondent William E. Kirksey (“Kirksey”) has moved pursuant to Rule 60(b) Fed.R.Civ.P. for relief from an order issued by this court directing Kirksey to comply with an Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) summons. Petitioners, the United States of America and Revenue Officer James F. Spillane (the “government”) have cross-moved for an order holding Kirksey in civil contempt for his failure to comply with the IRS summons which directed him to pro duce certain records in his possession. For the reasons set forth below, Kirksey’s Rule 60(b) motion is denied, and the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tyrone SILAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Dg Acquisition Corp. Debtor. Dg Creditor Corp., Trustee for the Dg Creditor Trust v. Ivette Dabah, Barbara Dabah, Renee Dabah, and Yvette DabahCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States of America and Gwendolyn Scott, Revenue Officer of the Internal Revenue Service v. Charles L. SorrellsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. KirkseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- O'Grady v. Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Oxford Capital Securities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.