Legal Opinion
The Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corp. v. Binks Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. Texas
Decided February 21, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 64-H-95PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SINGLETON, District Judge.
The above entitled and numbered cause, having been tried before the Court without a jury, at the close of the evidence and after hearing arguments of counsel, this Court adopts the following opinion as its findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Plaintiff, Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corporation (Spee-Flo), a Texas corporation, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of spray painting equipment and has its principal place of business in Houston, Texas. Defendant, Binks Manufacturing Company (Binks), a Delaware corporation, is also engaged in the manufacture and sale…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- Phillips Petroleum Company v. Sid Richardson Carbon & Gasoline CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Ex-Cell-O Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
- LAITRAM CORPORATION v. Deepsouth Packing Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
- Binks Manufacturing Company v. The Spee-Flo Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.