LAITRAM CORPORATION v. Deepsouth Packing Co.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
RUBIN, District Judge:
Brevity may be wit’s soul but it is no part of patent litigation. This case is proof enough. It involves two patents for use in deveining shrimp. Disregarding scriptural advice, 1 and assisted no doubt by the ease with which dictating machines, electric typewriters, and elec trostatic reproduction processes produce paper work in volume, counsel have favored the court with a total of over 500 pages of briefs and memoranda. They have submitted pre-trial memoranda, trial briefs, post trial briefs, reply memoranda, second reply memoranda and even a reply to a memorandum in…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Autotech Technologies Ltd. Partnership v. Automationdirect.com, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- The Laitram Corporation v. Deepsouth Packing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Julien v. Gomez & Andre Tractor Repairs, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1977
- Matter of Vestavia Associates Ltd. PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.