Legal Opinion

Binks Manufacturing Company v. The Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 18, 1968No. 24851_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The Spee-Flo Manufacturing Company, appellee, charged Sinks Manufacturing Company, appellant, with infringement of Spee-Flo patent number 3,000,576. The District Court found the patent valid and infringed. The opinion of the District Court is published at 264 F.Supp. 542 (1967).

Although most favorably impressed by the brilliant argument of counsel for ap pellant, presented both orally and in briefs, we are nevertheless convinced that the District Judge was right. We see no necessity for duplication of or further comment on the opinion below.

The judgment, therefore, will be affirmed and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corp. v. Binks Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Texas · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
  2. Ex-Cell-O Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
  3. Antici v. KBH Corp.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1971
  4. Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corp. v. Braniff Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. The Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corporation v. Braniff Airways, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API