Legal Opinion
Ex-Cell-O Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 26, 1979No. 5-71654PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RALPH M. FREEMAN, District Judge.
This action was commenced on August 25, 1975, by plaintiff Ex-Cell-0 Corporation which seeks a declaratory judgment that United States Letters Patent 3,709,623 is invalid and unenforceable. The defendants in this action, Litton Industries, Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiary, Litton Industrial Products, Inc., the latter being the current owner of the patent in suit, have filed a counterclaim for preliminary and final injunctive relief against the infringement of this patent by the plaintiff.
Following extensive discovery, the plaintiff made…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Buildex Incorporated v. Kason Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Brasseler, U.S.A. I, L.P. v. Stryker Sales Corporation and Stryker Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Stewart-Warner Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. The City of Pontiac, Michigan, and American Sign & Indicator Corporation, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Buildex Inc. v. Kason Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Dragani v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.