Legal Opinion
In re Wright
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 20, 2005No. 04-BG-339PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
Considering four consolidated disciplinary complaints involving five separate clients, the Board on Professional Responsibility has concluded that respondent Ronald A. Wright committed numerous violations of the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct. The violations, which are undisputed, revealed a pattern of dishonesty and disregard for the rights and interests of his clients and third parties in his criminal defense and plaintiffs personal injury practice. More specifically, as detailed in its report, the Board has found that respondent (1) neglected a client’s matter in violation of Rule 1.3…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re HinesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re RosenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re CorizziDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re DanielDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re SilvaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In Re FlynnDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re Kenneth A. MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.