Legal Opinion
Millholen v. Riley
California Supreme Court
Decided November 3, 1930No. Docket No. L.A. 11805PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
Original proceeding in mandate.
Petitioner was on July 1, 1929, appointed a secretary of the District Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Two. Respondents are the State Controller, the Department of Finance of the State of California and the members thereof.
Petitioner received her appointment from the court she was serving and her compensation for such services was fixed by the same authority at $225 per month. She served during the months of July and August, 1929. The court approved her demand for said sum as salary for each of said months and ordered it paid from the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Tarpey v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Nicholl v. KosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- State ex rel. Schneider v. CunninghamMontana Supreme Court · 1909
- Bateman v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Vondy v. Commissioners Court of Uvalde CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Superior Court v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.